FDIC Collected few insurance fees for a decade |

FDIC Collected few insurance fees for a decade

The federal agency that insures bank deposits, which is asking for emergency powers to borrow up to $500 billion to take over failed banks, is facing a potential major shortfall in part because it collected no insurance premiums from most banks from 1996 to 2006.

… a booming economy left banks flush with cash, and by 1996 the insurance fund was considered so large that it could grow through interest payments and fees charged only to banks with high credit risk. Congress agreed that premiums didn’t need to be collected if the fund was sustained at a level that was considered safe. Thus, about 95 percent of banks paid no premiums from 1996 to 2006 …

James Chessen, chief economist of the American Bankers Association, said that it made sense at the time to stop collecting most premiums because “the fund became so large that interest income on the fund was covering the premiums for almost a decade.” There were relatively few bank failures and no projection of the current economic collapse, he said.

“Obviously hindsight is 20-20,” Chessen said.

Last 5 posts by MacroMan

Thiel: Still heading toward deflationary endgame - August 4th, 2010
Around the markets in 6 charts or less - May 6th, 2010
Quotable - May 5th, 2010
Quoteable - April 29th, 2010
Pimco Warns of Deflation Risk as Central Banks to Cool Stimulus - April 21st, 2010