Japan is off 11%, and the yen is stronger – I guess that’s what happens when a natural disaster moves a country 8 feet over and brings it to the bring of nuclear meltdown. Following the sun, European markets are off 3-5%, and closer to home futures are down 2-3% on the US equity futures.
So why are not all dips created the same? The easy answer is magnitude, but that is a false perspective. 3% looked big a few days ago, for example, so it all becomes relative. Second, it seems more dramatic when it happens in one day, but what if the markets had lost 3% over the course of a week? Suddenly that same dip doesn’t seem as extreme. Lastly, part of the conversation has to revolve around the underlying causes for pullbacks, namely, is it just technical, or moneyflows, or valuations, or a natural disaster.
When a pullback happens at high valuations, as we have seen sporadically in the US markets, traders can buy the dip for a bounce, but the risk is to the downside. With fundamentals working against you, shortening holding times and position sizes will work to reduce risk. It’s not my bag, but some people do it successfully and more power to them. It’s the reason people will buy into the gap down this morning, hoping to catch a bounce. I will stay short the market, because valuations are working against it.
Japan, on the other hand, is a different type of dip. I thought the Japanese equity markets were attractive on a fundamental level BEFORE the earthquake and I thought the yen was overvalued. Both positions have now moved against me and wiped out any gains I had. The question here is whether Japan is an opportunity to buy the dip?
Before answering that, I want to point out another “buy-the-dip” question that has come up around our portfolios…nuclear companies. We are still sitting on nice gains in our positions, but those will probably be wiped out today. Is this the time to get out?
So let me share with you my thought process. Japan is a buying opportunity IF (and that’s a big IF) they can contain the nuclear reactors. Barring that, they may face a huge demographic shift out of near-by cities and in the short term will face a recession or depression that will make their 20 year slow moving recession seem quaint. That makes me wary of adding to the position. I’m not selling, but I’m comfortable with the risk in the portfolio, and I usually don’t like to pyramid positions in either directions anyway, so this position will stay. In essence, but losing our gains in the position, it is just down to it’s original allocation. Nuclear is much more interesting to me. The nuclear companies are down 15-50% in a few days. The main question is whether there will be nuclear energy in the next few years and I believe there will be. While the media talks of the potential damage, the other alternatives have their own environmental and human toll. The difference is that the alternatives are not dramatic in their impacts. It’s like people being afraid of planes crashing because they are dramatic, but not thinking about the risks of driving which are much higher. Nuclear, in this case, being the plane.All of that was to say that I’ll be looking to add to this exposure in the next few days. Not immediately, but eventually.
Lastly, these types of markets provide opportunities for disconnects – NAV premiums/discounts, ADR pairs, spin-offs and cross holdings, etc. all tend to trade inefficiently. Those opportunities should be at least noted, or if you’re a professional trader, they need to be harvested.
Relevant ETFs: NLR, DXJ, EWJ, IWM, RWM, SPY, SH, FXY