Posts tagged: Financial Crisis

Deadly discount rate

We’re reading more and more about research being done in low to negative real interest rate environments. For example, what discount rate should we use for valuations? All the PE deals being struck, what WACC are they using? Who’s financing it at a fixed rate? For that matter, how are the banks figuring out their spreads over LIBOR?

We often go back to the same set of books and principles, and I’m reminded of Ed Easterling’s book Unexpected Returns. We are moving from a period of price stability to instability. It doesn’t actually matter for valuations whether we move towards inflation or deflation – both will be bad for stocks. That being said, I’m heartened by the articles coming out that hopefully provide a reality check. Today, for example, in the Asia Times, David Goldman highlights why a low interest rate environment makes today’s valuations look exceedingly expensive.This article is a great start to trying to measure the sensitivity of stocks to changes in the interest rate – AT THESE RATES. That’s they key. These are still not normal times! Goldman describes a (crude, but effective for order of magnitude) model to measure equity duration (interest-rate sensitivity).

The recovery of the S&P 500 since its March 2009 lows reflects an anemic level of earnings as well as a very low discount rate. A rise in the short-term interest rate (in reality, in the whole yield curve) could take a very big bite out of equity prices. I don’t quite believe that a 2% risk free rate implies a drop in the S&P by half — this is a numerical example rather than a realistic model — but it does highlight the sensitivity to watch out for.

To read the full article (which you should), click here.

Naysayers will tell you a lot of things about imminent recoveries, low relative P/E’s, or forward P/E expectations. I’m still wary of valuations based on unrealistic circumstances and inputs.

The Silver Lining to the Debt Crisis

Here’s the by line from the article in Barron’s: “Could a Japanese debt crisis help spur a rally? Perhaps, if it fuels the yen carry trade.”

But rather than precipitating a panic, a decline in the overvalued yen would serve as a tonic in two ways.

The most obvious would be to give a lift to Japanese exporters, which have been hampered by the yen’s strength, not only against the dollar but even more so against other currencies. Remember, the greenback has appreciated markedly in the past four months against a basket of currencies, as represented by the U.S. Dollar Index.

Meanwhile, the yen has more than kept pace, which has two important implications. Relative to other major currencies such as the euro, the yen has gained even more. And relative to the Chinese renminbi, which effectively is pegged to the dollar, the yen has also risen, reducing Japan’s competitiveness versus that export colossus.

The effects of an lower yen were readily apparent Monday when the Nikkei stock average soared 2%, as the dollar firmed in reaction to Friday’s news of a smaller-than-expected dip in U.S. payrolls in February. But the positive momentum faded early Tuesday in Tokyo as the yen steadied.

The impact of a weaker yen would be felt worldwide if it spurs a renewal of so-called carry trade. That would involve using yen to fund purchases of other, higher-yielding securities. In its simplest form, a yen-carry trade might involve borrowing yen, costing practically nothing, to buy Australian bonds yielding 4%.

Then yen-carry pays the spread between the two interest rates. With the magic of leverage, that nearly four-point spread can be multiplied many times. Borrow, buy; repeat, to paraphrase the shampoo instructions.

The risk isn’t the usual one with leverage — a rise in borrowing costs. The Bank of Japan isn’t moving away from its zero-interest-rate policy any time soon; in fact, it is looking for additional means to ease monetary policy. The risk of the carry trade is exchange rates. But when the yen rises, the cost of that borrowing increases because the yen-carry trade is effectively a short sale of the currency.

That was readily apparent during the markets’ meltdown in late 2009 and 2010, when the dollar and the yen soared, partially because of a scramble for the safe haven of these currencies. But less apparent was the demand for dollars and yen to unwind carry trades — to cover those shorts. It was the mother of all margin calls.

Perhaps the best gauge of global markets’ risk appetite is the euro-yen exchange rate. When that appetite is robust, the euro tends to be strong and the yen is weak, and vice versa. So, as the Greek crisis built, the euro-yen rate went from about 133 yen to the euro in January to around 121 yen per euro, before backing off Monday to 123. When markets were in rally mode last summer, euro/yen traded as high as 138.

The ideal funding currency for a carry trade is one that is likely to get cheaper. One thing that ought to weigh on the yen is Japan’s parlous fiscal situation, which has gained increasing attention since Barron’s Jon Laing gave it the attention it deserved nearly six months ago (“Is the Sun Setting on Japan,” Sept. 28.)

For the full article, click here.

For readers of our letter, shorting the yen is not a new theme. In my opinion it is a fat pitch, with the main source of risk being timing rather than direction, so maintaining appropriate leverage is key. The secondary question is what people will do with the currencies that they purchase. For example, if you short the yen and buy dollars, where will those dollars flow? Treasuries? With mini-yields, they don’t really offer a good trade-off. Aussie bonds? Perhaps. I’m sure some fund managers miss the days of being able to buy some Icelandic offerings – but those funds are probably gone anyway.

The answer is that there could be a global carry trade, much bigger than the one described in the article, whereby dollars and yen and euro are used to fund risk trades. That trade is an inflation trade in another form – everyone wants to get rid of their cash and put it into assets (physical or financial). It’s not a long equity play at all, but rather a short currency play that is being manifested in the markets.  It would explain 17% U-6 unemployment, with awful demographics across Europe and Japan (especially), and a tapped out US consumer, with increased financial and physical assets.

There is another option…which is just that the markets are pricing in a recovery ahead of better numbers up ahead.

Connect the dots 6-10-09: Part I

We’re going to start the weekend with our weekly market monitors.

Market Monitor

 

relative-returns-monitor

What do we have here? This year is full of stress, but looking at the broad averages, the S&P is down slightly. What a ride!? So what do we see when we look deeper?…

Commodities (ex natural gas), emerging markets, and tech certainly pop out. Interestingly, I’m not sure they are telling the same story. Tech tends to be low debt companies. Earlier today Goldman even upgraded Dell and hinted that investors should revisit tech. Companies would be pulling back on some tech investing in the current environment, except…Except for productivity enhancing tech or cost saving tech. Remember, a lot of companies still have cash on their balance sheet from a year of decreased transactions. Stock buy-backs and dividends aren’t where the companies want to spend their cash because re-issuing shares down the line seems questionable at this stage. Large acquisitions are out of the question. So, what’s left?

Commodity related industries tend to be capital intensive and they’re certainly levered to any growth. Yet, in an environment like this, growth assumptions are low or negative for most of the world, so I doubt that the argument holds. Instead, maybe the answer lies in the expectation that inventories need to be rebuilt. Over the past 18 months, despite the consumer slowdown, production levels decreased even faster and inventories have shrunk to the point where any pickup could send producers scrambling. Who’s facing the shortest inventory? Not surprisingly, our old auto industry is front and center. Once again, the US auto manufacturers are going to get caught flat-footed. They’ll finally face a little bit of demand, but not enough capacity will be on line and commodity prices will have gotten away from them.

Anyway, TBT continues to grind lower and any “investors” left in it, should see some of our previous postings on levered ETF’s. It will slowly grind away at your returns, even if the direction is correct. (I do not own TBT nor do I own it in client accounts.) I’ll speak more about the bonds complex next week, but I have to admit that everyone and their brother is telling me about bonds with equity like returns, but sitting at the top of the capital structure. I think the “easy money” of buying solid bonds at 60 to 70 cents on the dollar is gone. Now you’re in for a grind with the smartest guys in the room. Maybe that 8-9% yield on a BBB credit is OK given that Treasuries are paying 3%, but when Treasuries go to 6% (not a far stretch) these will go down much farther and much faster. Do you really think the yield will go down? So you’re clipping a nice coupon, which is well and good as long as they pay, but if California can default so can that from AA company. And if you think the economy will improve, better to get the leverage in the equity. It’s probably at decade lows (using a representative BBB company).

Barron’s has mentioned it. The Big Picture has mentioned it. So you should at least be aware of it. Last year, Rogoff and Reinhart wrote an analysis of financial crises and the impacts on different asset classes: Aftermath. The basic conclusion: in the aftermath of a financial crisis, asset classes show higher correlation and there are very few places to park. Equities and real estate and bonds and whatever all face severe headwinds. All of that was to say, watch out for the 8% bonds. It might just be a trap.

Length of US Recessions

From Chart of The Day (www.chartoftheday.com):

 

While the stock market has rallied nicely since bottoming on March 9th, the economy continues to struggle. For some perspective on the current economic recession, today’s chart illustrates the duration of all US recessions since 1900. As today’s chart illustrates, the five longest recessions all began prior to 1930. The length of the current recession (now in its 18th month) is above average and the longest recession since the Great Depression.

Length of US Recessions

Questioning the Decouplers Out There…

As I’ve written before, I am not a big fan of the decoupling theory. For one, I believe that there is an iterative process between developed and emerging economies. The US impacts China and vice versa. They are more connected now than ever before. You cannot believe in decoupling while still believing that China impacts US Treasury yields (which I hope you do). So on an economic level, I think decoupling is unsupported, at best. The second issue is on the financial markets level. Is there a decrease in correlation between emerging markets and developed markets? Should we anticipate less correlation in the future or more? In this respect, I think that thinking of emerging markets as a whole may be a mistake. As an emerging market gets stronger, showing more depth of financial capital markets, we should expect to see less correlation with other markets. This is not decoupling per se. It is just macro-economics.

In a new paper, Nathaniel Frank and Heiko Hesse argue that:

Overall, the findings from the DCC GARCH models indicate that the notion of possible de-coupling (in the financial markets) had been misplaced. It is true that EM stock markets reached their peak around November 2007, but interlinkages between funding stress and equity markets in advanced economies and EM financial indicators were highly correlated and have seen sharp increases during specific crisis moments. Given the interconnectedness of global financial markets, investors’ increase in global risk aversion from problems in advanced economies rapidly spilled over into EM countries, as investors sought to pull out from the latter countries and only invest into the safest and most liquid assets in their home markets, such as fixed income securities.

For those rushing to emerging markets debt, etc. this paper should at least give you some tools to analyze the underlying assumptions about anticipated correlations (or lack thereof). Furthermore, it makes an interesting case for repatriation of assets in developed countries, which, should the financial crisis not be over, may lead to higher USD and JPY as money flows back home.

Financial Spillovers to Emerging Markets During the Global Financial Crisis

(http://ssrn.com/abstract=1408887)

What if we’re wrong?

When managing portfolios, understanding our personal biases is crucial and we need to continually question our own framework. To that end, I pose the simple question…”What if we’re wrong?”

Here’s the current thesis/set of themes/framework I and some of my colleagues are working under:

  • The US overconsumed. Trend is ending. World trade plunges.
  • Overconsumption was funded by the international community, and they get fed up and are unwilling to sell to US on credit any longer.
  • Real estate crashes. Credit crunch. Asset deflation globally.
  • World tries to inflate through printing money, quantitative easing, misdirected Keynesian government spending. Fails in the short-term, so governments borrow more.
  • Long-term, the world governments will succeed and fiat currencies around the world will face inflation or hyperinflation. Hard assets, such as gold will rise, Treasuries will go down.
  • US debt spirals out of control, while the debt-to-equity ratio buries future generations leading to massive tax hikes or devaluation of USD or both. Europe…who knows if the euro will even survive. Asia is the worlds hope, but not a dependable one. Social unrest globally is not unlikely, maybe even war.
  • In a decade or two, the world finds a new stabilization point. Baby boomer generation begins decreasing in size and prominence on the world stage. New technologies and trade will emerge. Some Asian countries will benefit, others will fall behind. Europe and the US will find firmer footing.
  • Another cycle begins.

So, with that in mind, what if our view is totally wrong. What if…

  • US consumer increases savings rate to 25% overnight. World trade takes a one-time hit. Deep recession ensues. Governments stop funding US, but savings rate makes up for it.
  •  World trade plunges, but so does the pressure on any protectionist measures.
  • Severe recession, with very limited demand for credit, but it stays cheap!
  • Mild inflatioin takes root, but excess capacity that has been building up in the past 18 months absorbs the shock.
  • Technological advances reach more industries as they try to increase productivity.  
  • Voters demand that the federal government follow state government procedures and balance the budget. This leads to a stable USD, and maintains the USD as the world reserve currency.
  • Medicare and Social Security benefits begin at at 72. AARP decides NOT to revolt because they planned on working a few more years anyway and they don’t want to screw over their grandchildren. Funding gap is narrowed overnight.
  • A virtuous cycle is started.

There are other scenarios. The thought exercise is to highlight that there is a chance that the US economy and the world economy are more resilient than doomsday scenarios would have us believe. I do believe that the US economy is long-term resilient, but I worry about the direction we are heading.

Check out this chart from Casey Research:

The Federal Government Will Have to Monetize the Gaps

It will be difficult to come out of these exponentially increasing debts without an eventual increase in long term rates. If Bill Gross is questioning the triple-A status of the US government, surely China, the Middle East, and the rest of the world are questioning the rates their getting on their paper. Even in the best case scenarios, federal tax receipts are declining by anywhere from 15-30%. In the meantime, the administration is focused on increasing government expenses rather than investments (the former is money that, once spent, has very little multiplier effect and is expensed immediately, while the latter has a large multiplier effect and the costs should be amortized over the life of the project which would help the budget).

So there is a chance we are wrong and we need to keep questioning our framework. However, at this stage, it’s tough to see the framework being challenged. When placing not just probability, but expected returns on different scenarios, the risk is still to the downside for the markets and the economy.

As Goes California?

California’s unemployment rate rose to 11.2% in March. http://www.bizjournals.com/losangeles/stories/2009/04/13/daily40.html.

 

Interesting highlight:

Educational and health services was the only category with a year-over-year gain, — 2.2 percent — with a 0.2 percent gain in March.

For a detailed breakdown, go here: http://assets.bizjournals.com/cms_media/sanfrancisco/calmr-1.pdf

 

Giving back TARP?!

How about this scenario: You take the risk, you put up the money, you ensure that no one out- maneuvers me in the marketplace, you pay me a ridiculous salary and you take on my future obligations for an unending period of time. In return, when any profits or money comes in, I’ll keep it.

 

This is the scenario now unfolding as Goldman, JP Morgan and scores of other banks are “giving back TARP”. As a taxpayer who was against giving them so much money with no concessions to begin with, I’m happy to hear it. Now, in addition, how about paying the taxpayers for the risk we took on. Banks are welcome and should pay back TARP, but that does not mean they get out of their future obligations. Let them give back TARP and still give the government the equity stakes. That way, taxpayers get their principle back, but benefit from any upside as compensation for taking on the risk, paying bank executives’ bonuses, and putting up money to shore up their balance sheets in the first place.

 

Some banks are complaining that they never wanted or needed TARP. Well, that may be. In that case, you should not have any finding the money you didn’t need since it’s probably just sitting in an account waiting to be given back. Separately, you should know that I also did not have any say in whether to give you TARP in the first place, but such are the mechanics of living in a society with a representative government – sometimes you have to give up some upside, for the benefit of having the government structures in place that allow you to do business in the first place.

 

I was against the intervention to begin with, but we intervened. Now, the least that I’m owed is some compensation for the risk I was forced into.

PBGC is going to be working overtime!

Ford Has $2.98 Billion Operating Loss as Sales Plunge

Nov. 7 (Bloomberg) — Ford Motor Co., with U.S. sales
shredded by the worst financial crisis since the Great
Depression, posted a third-quarter operating loss of $2.98
billion and said it used up $7.7 billion in cash.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aysNwuvCVmpw&refer=home

Posted by email from thehardtrade2′s posterous

Prepare for Inflation…NOT deflation

Nov. 7 (Bloomberg) — Japan will benefit from a strong yen
because it will hold down prices for raw materials, said Eisuke
Sakakibara
, formerly Japan’s top currency official.

“I still believe a strong yen is in the national interest
of Japan, particularly in this situation when raw material prices
will increase
,” Sakakibara said in an interview with Bloomberg
Television in Singapore yesterday. The yen may rise to as high as
80 per dollar as so-called carry trades unwind, said Sakakibara,
who was dubbed “Mr. Yen” during his 1997-1999 tenure at the
Finance Ministry because of his influence over currency markets.

The yen’s 15 percent gain against the dollar this year and
33 percent advance versus the euro prompted Japan’s government to
announce last month it may buy or sell currencies to influence
exchange rates, as the world’s second-largest economy stumbled.
Gross domestic product shrank by an annualized 3 percent in the
second quarter as exports dropped 2.5 percent, according to
government data.

Posted by email from thehardtrade2′s posterous

Tax Hikes, Budget Cuts In The Works For NYC

NEW YORK (CBS) ― Mayor
Michael Bloomberg is going to cut the city work force by 3,000, but
that’s just the beginning of the pain New Yorkers will feel as part of
the fiscal crisis. A slew of new taxes are also on the agenda.

http://wcbstv.com/local/michael.bloomberg.income.2.856839.html

Posted by email from thehardtrade2′s posterous

Seems like alot more then $700B is needed

A total $33.6 trillion of transactions are outstanding on
governments, companies and asset-backed securities worldwide,
based on gross numbers, the DTCC said in the report released on
its Web site yesterday. After canceling out overlapping trades,
investors have taken out a net $22.7 billion of contracts based
on Italy’s debt, $16.7 billion against Spain and $12.5 billion on
Deutsche Bank of Frankfurt, the report shows.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=auQSTZnaO5JY&refer=home

Posted by email from thehardtrade2′s posterous

California Cities Cut Police Budgets Housing Downturn, Weak Economy Sap Revenues, Forcing Public-Safety Reductions

VALLEJO, Calif. — When the economic crisis deepened this fall, this
city already was losing scores of police and firefighters because it
could no longer afford the rich salaries and benefits it offered after
the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. Now, with crime on the rise and tax
revenue sinking, this San Francisco Bay area city faces more cuts in
police and fire department budgets.

Posted by email from thehardtrade2′s posterous

Europe on the brink of currency crisis meltdown

The financial crisis spreading like wildfire across the former Soviet bloc
threatens to set off a second and more dangerous banking crisis in Western
Europe, tipping the whole Continent into a fully-fledged economic slump.

Currency pegs are being tested to destruction on the fringes of Europe’s
monetary union in a traumatic upheaval that recalls the collapse of the
Exchange Rate Mechanism in 1992.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/comment/ambroseevans_pritchard/3260052/Europe-on-the-brink-of-currency-crisis-meltdown.html

Posted by email from thehardtrade2′s posterous

Gulf Citizens Beg for Bailout as Stock Rout Signals End of Boom

Oct. 31 (Bloomberg) — Abdullah Hajeri led a march on the
Emir’s palace in Kuwait this week, demanding the oil-rich
nation’s ruler stop stocks from plunging. Adnan Mohammed Saleh,
down the Persian Gulf coast in Dubai, said he wants more
government protection from the global financial crisis.

“Every day the market is crashing,” said Saleh, a 42-year-
old trader, staring dumbfounded last Tuesday as company names
scrolled across the Dubai Stock Exchange’s outdoor ticker in red.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=a2df9V.O__gc&refer=home

Posted by email from thehardtrade2′s posterous